On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 09:50:00PM -0700, Fred Moyer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Another option would be to copy/local() the array in > > modpler_perl_call_list. Of course that still wont get it "right" > > because we wont run any newly defined subs... But at least we wont > > segfault/crap out. > > > > Thoughts? > > I think getting rid of the segfault is a good thing. But if the main > problem is issues with NYTProf, then it seems like this change won't > solve the core problem of autogenerated null end blocks faulting. I'm > don't fully understand the scope of these issues yet, so my answers > (and questions) may not be completely helpful.
I suggest the code shift items off the main array, like perl does, but also push those items onto a new temp array. When there are no more items in the main array it would copy the items back again (av_make() is handy for that). Tim.
