We actually use both dancer and modperl. but dancer works separately, it doesn't require modperl installed. So I was asking if there is a framework for modperl which behaves as something like dancer.
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 05:42 PM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote: > On 02.08.2017 11:19, 风河 wrote: > > Hi > > > > currently we were developing the methods mostly as handlers. > > is there a new popular framework for full stack development of modperl? > > > Yes, many. See here : > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=perl+web+development+frameworks > > We (still) use Template::Toolkit, which many people would consider a bit > old and not > really "in fashion". But it works, and is simple to learn and use. > Other frameworks can be said to be more modern, more elegant, more > fashionable, etc.. > But in my opinion, the more elegant and abstract a framework is, the > longer it takes to > really dominate it, the more difficult it is to figure out what really > happens when you > have a problem, and the less you are really "in control". > So the choice is yours, depending on > - where you are coming from > - where you want to go > - what kind of problems you have to solve > - how deep you still need to go into controlling what Apache does > - etc.. > There is no "one size fits all", and it is very easy to get into endless > on-line > discussions about which is "the best". > (Including with people who say that they are looking for "a framework", > but really mean "a > CMS system"). > >
