I have a v4.0.0 beta for sealed.pm that I expect will be fully operational with mod_perl+ithreads now, but I will let it soak for a week to see what happens in prod.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 3:30 PM Joe Schaefer <j...@sunstarsys.com> wrote: > You're welcome. Pardon my rudeness, but you will understand when I tell > you that I developed sealed.pm after proving ithreads are solid on > Solaris over 2 years ago, and communicated with the Perl5 community on FB > and LI about the same thing I did here last week. There is considerable > racism and dysfunction around the whole ithread effort involving p5p, and > that is plainly evident that those prejudices impact this project’s user > base, which is a real shame to see compared with the interest and > excitement around our work 20y ago. > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 3:23 PM Edward J. Sabol <edwardjsa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Aug 26, 2022, at 1:16 PM, Joe Schaefer <j...@sunstarsys.com> wrote: >> > AFAICT you guys are just too lazy to look. >> >> That came across as rude, Joe. Not all of us are experts at Perl >> internals or track the latest changes to Perl's ithread support and/or >> glibc, and it's generally been accepted in the mod_perl community for years >> that mod_perl only works reliably with mpm_prefork. To the best of my >> recollection, there haven't been any reports of mod_perl working under >> mpm_event prior to your messages about using it on Solaris a couple weeks >> ago. But thank you for sharing your knowledge and experiences. It does seem >> well worth exploring. >> >> Regards, >> Ed >> >> -- > Joe Schaefer, Ph.D. > We only build what you need built. > <j...@sunstarsys.com> > 954.253.3732 <//954.253.3732> > > > -- Joe Schaefer, Ph.D. We only build what you need built. <j...@sunstarsys.com> 954.253.3732 <//954.253.3732>
