>From: Andy Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I've been reading about how the moon landing may have been faked. The more >I find out the more convinced I am. > >Anyone know anything? >>
I worked for a co for 6 yrs that sold telescopes, and this question came by us every now and then... This is one of the major arguments of proponents of the hoax theory: There are no stars in the backgrounds of photos taken from the lunar surface. They say that since you see no stars in the background, then these obviously must be faked shots... What they missed: Stars are relatively dim, so for them to show up on a negative, an exposure must be at least 1 minute. The photos taken from the Apollo are snapshots, exposure time considerably less than 1 second. Hence, no stars in the background. It would seem to me that if you were doing serious research on this subject, this would be a pretty simple fact to come across. So, if they missed something as simple as this, how throrough could the rest of their evidence be? D _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aVxiMu.aVzSEg Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email was sent to: [email protected] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
