-- Topica Digest --
RE: The Organisation
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Organisation
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Organisation
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Organisation
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Organisation
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Organisation
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Mod Night in Toronto
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HIPSTERS THIS SATURDAY
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Organisation
By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:20:24 +0000
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: The Organisation
Do these untalented tubbos have a webpage? I usually like to look at a
band before hearing them, so I can form the proper opinion. Snarf.
I, too, am curious in hearing Summer's list of bad "80s Midwestern bands
trying to sound 60s and failing." Maybe she's referring to Doug and the
Slugs, ahehaha, I actually chuckled out loud as I typed that. Certainly
she's not speaking of The Funseekers, one of the finest bands to ever
birth from our country's midsection.
I am serious about my webpage inquiry, though.
S. Nutkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gee, Summer! I guess it's about being young and skinny, rather than
> talented. The Organisation are a really good band, and Adam is one of
> the sharpest cats on the LA scene, that's for sure, and has a great
> voice to boot! What's with the shock of mentioning them along with the
> Small Faces? What do you like? If I'm the first person that you've
> heard a positive response from, then you must be hanging out with the
> wrong crowd because they were recommended to me by someone who's opinion
>
> I trust, and they were right! Others had told me about them awhile ago,
>
> and the word was good! If you have that much animosity towards them ,
> then how come you were at their show last week, now that I know who you
> are? I stand behind my endorsement of the Organisation and recommend
> them to anyone who has a sense of good taste!
>
> Sean
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yes, I've seen them, too many times. I thought they were awful -
> > embarrassing, really. They sounded like an 80s Midwestern band trying to
> >
> >
> > sound 60s and failing. They are old and fat. As a product of Terry, I'm
> > not
> > surprised although I'm still in shock you have the nerve to compare them
> >
> > to
> > the Small Faces! You are the first person I have heard say anything
> > positive
> > about them. Steve Marriot?????? Please!
> > Yuck! I'll take the Mojo Filters over them any day.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:15:29 +0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: The Organisation
This was the only place I could find images of the group, I may be able
to find more, but check this out in the meantime to catch a glimpse of
the Organisation:
http://www.clubaugogo.com/club05.html
Sean
PS: I doubt she would be referring to the Funseekers, at least I hope
not!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do these untalented tubbos have a webpage? I usually like to look at a
> band before hearing them, so I can form the proper opinion. Snarf.
>
> I, too, am curious in hearing Summer's list of bad "80s Midwestern bands
>
> trying to sound 60s and failing." Maybe she's referring to Doug and the
> Slugs, ahehaha, I actually chuckled out loud as I typed that. Certainly
> she's not speaking of The Funseekers, one of the finest bands to ever
> birth from our country's midsection.
>
> I am serious about my webpage inquiry, though.
>
> S. Nutkin
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Gee, Summer! I guess it's about being young and skinny, rather than
> > talented. The Organisation are a really good band, and Adam is one of
> > the sharpest cats on the LA scene, that's for sure, and has a great
> > voice to boot! What's with the shock of mentioning them along with the
> > Small Faces? What do you like? If I'm the first person that you've
> > heard a positive response from, then you must be hanging out with the
> > wrong crowd because they were recommended to me by someone who's opinion
> >
> >
> > I trust, and they were right! Others had told me about them awhile ago,
> >
> >
> > and the word was good! If you have that much animosity towards them ,
> > then how come you were at their show last week, now that I know who you
> > are? I stand behind my endorsement of the Organisation and recommend
> > them to anyone who has a sense of good taste!
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Yes, I've seen them, too many times. I thought they were awful -
> > > embarrassing, really. They sounded like an 80s Midwestern band trying to
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > sound 60s and failing. They are old and fat. As a product of Terry, I'm
> > > not
> > > surprised although I'm still in shock you have the nerve to compare them
> > >
> > >
> > > to
> > > the Small Faces! You are the first person I have heard say anything
> > > positive
> > > about them. Steve Marriot?????? Please!
> > > Yuck! I'll take the Mojo Filters over them any day.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:18:11 +0000
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: The Organisation
Just had a thought here...Wasn't Graham Bond (of the Graham Bond
ORGANIZATION.....ahem) an older (not-teenage), chubby, balding guy? But
they were (are) held in rather high regard amongst the mod crowd right?
How can that be? They don't look like me, how can I like them?
Dan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gee, Summer! I guess it's about being young and skinny, rather than
> talented. The Organisation are a really good band, and Adam is one of
> the sharpest cats on the LA scene, that's for sure, and has a great
> voice to boot! What's with the shock of mentioning them along with the
> Small Faces? What do you like? If I'm the first person that you've
> heard a positive response from, then you must be hanging out with the
> wrong crowd because they were recommended to me by someone who's opinion
>
> I trust, and they were right! Others had told me about them awhile ago,
>
> and the word was good! If you have that much animosity towards them ,
> then how come you were at their show last week, now that I know who you
> are? I stand behind my endorsement of the Organisation and recommend
> them to anyone who has a sense of good taste!
>
> Sean
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yes, I've seen them, too many times. I thought they were awful -
> > embarrassing, really. They sounded like an 80s Midwestern band trying to
> >
> >
> > sound 60s and failing. They are old and fat. As a product of Terry, I'm
> > not
> > surprised although I'm still in shock you have the nerve to compare them
> >
> > to
> > the Small Faces! You are the first person I have heard say anything
> > positive
> > about them. Steve Marriot?????? Please!
> > Yuck! I'll take the Mojo Filters over them any day.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:22:21 +0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: The Organisation
What about Dick Heckstall-Smith? He looked like he could be a
grandfather back in 1964...completely bald with thick horn rimmed
glasses, but no matter how motley the Graham Bond Organisation looked,
there's no denying how great they were! Listen to "Live At Klooks
Kleek" for proof of that.
Sean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just had a thought here...Wasn't Graham Bond (of the Graham Bond
> ORGANIZATION.....ahem) an older (not-teenage), chubby, balding guy? But
> they were (are) held in rather high regard amongst the mod crowd right?
> How can that be? They don't look like me, how can I like them?
>
> Dan
>
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:03:46 +0000
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: The Organisation
Or (belaboring the obvious) Pete Townsend. Christ, what a honker!
Okay, I hope the point is made. To wit, "you can't judge a book by
looking at its cover."
Thanks for the link to the Organisation pix.
Pop quiz, hotshots: who covered the song mentioned in the quote above on
the Pebbles "Roots of Mod" comp?
-S. Nutkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What about Dick Heckstall-Smith? He looked like he could be a
> grandfather back in 1964...completely bald with thick horn rimmed
> glasses, but no matter how motley the Graham Bond Organisation looked,
> there's no denying how great they were! Listen to "Live At Klooks
> Kleek" for proof of that.
>
> Sean
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Just had a thought here...Wasn't Graham Bond (of the Graham Bond
> > ORGANIZATION.....ahem) an older (not-teenage), chubby, balding guy? But
> > they were (are) held in rather high regard amongst the mod crowd right?
> > How can that be? They don't look like me, how can I like them?
> >
> > Dan
> >
>
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:13:11 +0000
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: The Organisation
Sorry, sent that too quick without clarifying my quiz question:
Who covered a song by the artist who does the song mentioned in the
quote below on the Pebbles 6- Roots of Mod comp? Bonus point if you know
the answer without having to blow th dust off the record cover to read
it.
Never mind, the NyQuil's kicking in now. I'll be on my way.
S. Nutkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Or (belaboring the obvious) Pete Townsend. Christ, what a honker!
>
> Okay, I hope the point is made. To wit, "you can't judge a book by
> looking at its cover."
>
> Thanks for the link to the Organisation pix.
>
> Pop quiz, hotshots: who covered the song mentioned in the quote above on
>
> the Pebbles "Roots of Mod" comp?
>
> -S. Nutkin
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What about Dick Heckstall-Smith? He looked like he could be a
> > grandfather back in 1964...completely bald with thick horn rimmed
> > glasses, but no matter how motley the Graham Bond Organisation looked,
> > there's no denying how great they were! Listen to "Live At Klooks
> > Kleek" for proof of that.
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Just had a thought here...Wasn't Graham Bond (of the Graham Bond
> > > ORGANIZATION.....ahem) an older (not-teenage), chubby, balding guy? But
> > > they were (are) held in rather high regard amongst the mod crowd right?
> > > How can that be? They don't look like me, how can I like them?
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:29:10 +0000
From: Charlton Pimblegrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: New Mod Night in Toronto
Join us for the inaugural Self-Preservation Society this Friday, March
15 at Ciao Edie located at 489 College Street in Toronto, Canada.
Visit our website at:
http://www.selfpreservation.ca
Cheers!
Kyle
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:10:40 -0000
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HIPSTERS THIS SATURDAY
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C1C9C7.502BB0C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
HIPSTERS presents a 60's beat, garage, british r'n'b, blue eyed soul, psych, pop &
rock rave-up this saturday 16th March at the Pleasure Unit, 359 Bethnal Green Rd,
London E2.
(tune Bethnal Grn- Central lne - 5 min walk)
Resident Dj's Dr Robert & Jack White are joined by Mark Ellis of (Brighton Beach/Nuts)
on the dex and complimented by our gorgeous go go girls and groovy visuals.
Doors 9pm-2am/ Adm �5
------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C1C9C7.502BB0C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>HIPSTERS presents a 60's beat, garage, british
r'n'b, blue eyed soul, psych, pop & rock rave-up this saturday 16th March at
the Pleasure Unit, 359 Bethnal Green Rd, London E2.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>(tune Bethnal Grn- Central lne - 5 min
walk)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Resident Dj's Dr Robert & Jack White are joined
by Mark Ellis of (Brighton Beach/Nuts) on the dex and complimented by our
gorgeous go go girls and groovy visuals.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Doors 9pm-2am/ Adm
�5</FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV>
</BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C1C9C7.502BB0C0--
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 03:59:43 -0500
From: "Ralph, Catherine (C.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: The Organisation
Dan,
I thought you were chubby and balding !!! Hehehehehe
Kitty
Regards
Catherine Ralph,
Pre-Production Analyst,
Interior Electronics, BOMM, VISTEON,
Tel :- 01268 - 40 - 4864, Fax :- 01268 - 40 - 4488,
E-MAIL :- [EMAIL PROTECTED], MAIL :- 28 / 200.
**************************************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 March 2002 17:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The Organisation
Just had a thought here...Wasn't Graham Bond (of the Graham Bond
ORGANIZATION.....ahem) an older (not-teenage), chubby, balding guy? But
they were (are) held in rather high regard amongst the mod crowd right?
How can that be? They don't look like me, how can I like them?
Dan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gee, Summer! I guess it's about being young and skinny, rather than
> talented. The Organisation are a really good band, and Adam is one of
> the sharpest cats on the LA scene, that's for sure, and has a great
> voice to boot! What's with the shock of mentioning them along with the
> Small Faces? What do you like? If I'm the first person that you've
> heard a positive response from, then you must be hanging out with the
> wrong crowd because they were recommended to me by someone who's opinion
>
> I trust, and they were right! Others had told me about them awhile ago,
>
> and the word was good! If you have that much animosity towards them ,
> then how come you were at their show last week, now that I know who you
> are? I stand behind my endorsement of the Organisation and recommend
> them to anyone who has a sense of good taste!
>
> Sean
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yes, I've seen them, too many times. I thought they were awful -
> > embarrassing, really. They sounded like an 80s Midwestern band trying to
> >
> >
> > sound 60s and failing. They are old and fat. As a product of Terry, I'm
> > not
> > surprised although I'm still in shock you have the nerve to compare them
> >
> > to
> > the Small Faces! You are the first person I have heard say anything
> > positive
> > about them. Steve Marriot?????? Please!
> > Yuck! I'll take the Mojo Filters over them any day.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
------------------------------
End of [EMAIL PROTECTED] digest, issue 891
