On Thu, Jun 24, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 22, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I'm pleased to hear that you have plans to re-integrate gcache, or rather
> > something similar, back into mod_ssl.
>
> Is it normal to use ldap server here? openldlap.org as an example
> [...]
LDAP? Hmmmm.. we talk about storing and retrieving sessions. The retrieving
might work with LDAP, but AFAIK LDAP isn't designed for online _storing_
things like in a cache, isn't it? From my understanding LDAP databases are
intended mostly for read-only access. But I might be wrong...
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: certs and load balancing? Anonymous
- Re: certs and load balancing? Anonymous
- Re: certs and load balancing? Anonymous
- Re: certs and load balancing? Anonymous
- Re: certs and load balancing? Anonymous
- Re: certs and load balancing? Anonymous
- Re: certs and load balancing? Anonymous
- Re: certs and load balancing? Anonymous
- Re: certs and load balancing? Anonymous
- Re: certs and load balancing? Anonymous
- Re: Odd client behaviour Anonymous
- Re: Odd client behaviour Anonymous
- RE: mod_ssl 2.3.4 + RH6.0 ==> SIGSEGV Anonymous
- Re: mod_ssl 2.3.4 + RH6.0 ==> SIGSEGV Anonymous
- RE: mod_ssl 2.3.4 + RH6.0 ==> SIGSEGV Anonymous
- Re: mod_ssl 2.3.4 + RH6.0 ==> SIGSEGV Anonymous
- RE: mod_ssl 2.3.4 + RH6.0 ==> SIGSEGV Anonymous
- Re: mod_ssl 2.3.4 + RH6.0 ==> SIGSEGV Anonymous
- Re: mod_ssl 2.3.4 + RH6.0 ==> SIGSEGV Anonymous
- Re: mod_ssl 2.3.4 + RH6.0 ==> SIGSEGV Anonymous
