On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 12:00:24PM -0400, I wrote:
> I'm trying to build Apache 1.3.6 mod_perl and mod_ssl using openssl on
> a Solaris box.  The relevant version numbers are:
> 
> Solaris 2.6
> Apache 1.3.6
> mod_perl 1.19
> mod_ssl 2.3.11
> openssl 0.9.4
> gcc 2.8.1
[...]
> 
> That all works fine, and the Apache configure sees both mod_perl and
> mod_ssl and configures them in.  Then I try to run the Apache make,
> and it gets as far as building mod_ssl and croaks with this error:
> 
> ===> src/modules/ssl
> gcc -c  -I../../os/unix -I../../include   -DSOLARIS2=260 -DMOD_PERL -DMOD_SSL=203111 
>-DEAPI `../../apaci` -DSSL_COMPAT \
> -DSSL_USE_SDBM -I/src/openssl-0.9.4/include -DMOD_SSL_VERSION=\"2.3.11\" mod_ssl.c
> In file included from mod_ssl.c:65:
> mod_ssl.h:496: parse error before `AP_MM'
> mod_ssl.h:496: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
> mod_ssl.h:511: parse error before `}'
> mod_ssl.h:511: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
> *** Error code 1
> make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `mod_ssl.o'
> 
> I am not using MM (the load on this server will be very light), and
> it's not installed on the system.  It looks like mod_ssl.h was
> expecting a "typedef void AP_MM;" but the header file for it was never
> included.  I tried running the Apache configure from the Apache
> directory with the same options, and got the same error when I ran make.

Nobody has answered so far.

I wonder, has *anyone* built Apache 1.3.6 with mod_ssl 2.3.x & openssl 0.9.4
but *without* mm, successfully?  Is it at all possible to do this?  How?

  --  Cos (Ofer Inbar)  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  --  Exodus Professional Services  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "We all misuse the net for personal gain, one way or another."
    -- Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)                   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                            [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to