On Wed, Sep 29, 1999, Michael Richardson wrote:
> >>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf S Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ralf> With a stock RH 6.0? Now I'm confused. I've tried 2.4.4 with such a
> Ralf> platform and it worked fine, because 6.0 is not broken. And others
> Ralf> confirmed this, too. Can it be that you have RH 6.0 but an older
> Ralf> glibc 2.0? How is semctl(2) defined in your headers? Ralf
>
> gomul-[vol/u3/home/mcr] 1 %rpm -qf /usr/include/sys/sem.h
> glibc-devel-2.1.1-6
> gomul-[vol/u3/home/mcr] 2 %uname -a
> Linux gomul 2.2.9 #4 SMP Mon Jun 7 11:46:04 EDT 1999 i586 unknown
>
> gomul-[vol/u3/home/mcr] 3 %grep semctl /usr/include/sys/sem.h
> extern int semctl __P ((int __semid, int __semnum, int __cmd, ...));
>
> but, semun isn't defined so it can't be used in ssl_engine_mutex.c
Errr.... wait: Fine, your platform is correct. But then mod_ssl 2.4.4 should
work for you fine the same way it worked for me on RH6. Because "union semun"
is no longer required by mod_ssl 2.4.4 in ssl_engine_mutex.c. Instead I guess
you're still trying 2.4.3...
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
