Mads Toftum wrote: > I'm not saying that there isn't a bug, I'm just saying that it is supposed to > work that way. I just looked back into the list archive and could see that > we've had this discussion before ;-) Are you still using mod_ssl 2.2.8? Till Sept 20, 'cause in US I am, and therefore on Red Hat I depend. ;-) > Looking through the changes file I can see several changes to the passphrase > handling code - it may very well have been fixed since then. I'll try it out > with one of the latest versions in a couple of days just to make sure that > it doesn't have the same problem. Thanks a lot Mads.
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Yeak Nai Siew
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Balazs Nagy
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Mads Toftum
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Mads Toftum
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Balazs Nagy
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Mads Toftum
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Balazs Nagy
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Mads Toftum
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Balazs Nagy
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Gianni Mariani
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Thomas A. Halter
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Thomas A. Halter
- Re: Running with mutliple keys Ralf S. Engelschall
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature