Mads Toftum wrote:

> I'm not saying that there isn't a bug, I'm just saying that it is supposed to
> work that way. I just looked back into the list archive and could see that
> we've had this discussion before ;-) Are you still using mod_ssl 2.2.8?

Till Sept 20, 'cause in US I am, and therefore on Red Hat I depend. ;-)

> Looking through the changes file I can see several changes to the passphrase
> handling code - it may very well have been fixed since then. I'll try it out
> with one of the latest versions in a couple of days just to make sure that
> it doesn't have the same problem.

Thanks a lot Mads.

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to