> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ralf S. Engelschall
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2000, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> > <<<From what I can tell, but it may be a completely unrelated memory
> > leak, I'm
> > not sure. Either way, it's pretty damn small, and not something to
> > worry
> > about too much. It's much better now that it was in mod_ssl-2.6.4.>>>
> >
> > Great. I'd recommend that you repost your patch with [PATCH] at the
> > beginning of the subject line so that it'll catch Ralf's attention,
> > then. I have yet to hear him pipe up on this topic, so he might not
> > have been following along, and this is clearly a very important issue...
>
> I'm reading all threads on modssl-users, but not on a daily basis (I'm
> involved in really too many projects, so I cannot pay attention
> in real-time).
> But I'm now catching up on this issue. But I'm still not
> convinced whether we
> just need the surrounding #ifdef SHARED_MODULE ... #endif stuff.
> I really have
> to look deeper to make sure we solve the problem the correct way and not
> introduce a new problem (perhaps a new memory leak).
Good to hear from you, Ralf. If you look at some of the posts I made, I
explain why I think it's the right thing to do. But being new to Apache
module hacking, I'm not completely sure, either.
I tested the patch by restarting the server a couple hundred times with both
graceful/restart, and the building mod_ssl static doesn't appear to leak
memory.
The DSO version seems to leak a bit of memory, but the patch doesn't change
anything for that case.
-Dave
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
