I could not get the Red Hat 6.2 distribution to work with respect to IP
based virtual hosts and SSL but had no problem after doing my own build. I'm
an extreme newbie with Apache and haven't done any further investigation,
but I stongly suspect the Red Hat distribution isn't up to snuff. 

-Lou

-----Original Message-----
From: Mads Toftum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Another Virtual Hosts Question (1 SSL + 2 non-SSL, all
virtua l)


On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 12:12:07PM -0500, Adrian Stovall wrote:
> After biting the bullet on my inability to use a single IP for multiple
SSL
> hosts (and using up a couple of extra IP's), I am left wondering
something.
> Why doesn't IP/port based virtual hosting (say, 1.2.3.4:443,
1.2.3.4:11001,
> 1.2.3.4:11002, 1.2.3.4:11003, etc) work.  Assuming you explicitly tell the
> client the port number with every link, what breaks SSL with this type of
> virtual host?
> 
> I tried many different ways of getting this to work, but had no luck.
Mads,
> maybe you could shed some light.
> 
Well, it should work - so I'm guessing that you've misconfigured
something...
Try out /path/to/apache/bin/httpd -S -DSSL to see what vhosts apache can
find.

vh

Mads Toftum
-- 
`Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall

______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)                   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                            [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)                   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                            [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to