Hi,
With Session Cache size = 7864432 bytes, here's a log that I'm
seeing :
[12/Dec/2001 13:36:51 05786] [trace] for 7864424 bytes, recommending 65536
indexes
[12/Dec/2001 13:36:51 05786] [trace] shmcb_init_memory choices follow
[12/Dec/2001 13:36:51 05786] [trace] division_mask = 0x7F
[12/Dec/2001 13:36:51 05786] [trace] division_offset = 52
[12/Dec/2001 13:36:51 05786] [trace] division_size = 61440
[12/Dec/2001 13:36:51 05786] [trace] queue_size = 8
[12/Dec/2001 13:36:51 05786] [trace] index_num = 0
[12/Dec/2001 13:36:51 05786] [trace] index_offset = 8
[12/Dec/2001 13:36:51 05786] [trace] index_size = 12
[12/Dec/2001 13:36:51 05786] [trace] cache_data_offset = 8
[12/Dec/2001 13:36:51 05786] [trace] cache_data_size = 61424
[12/Dec/2001 13:36:51 05786] [trace] leaving shmcb_init_memory()
the INDEX_NUM value is 0 !!!!!
is this a bug or a feature ?.. I think the data structures needs another
round of verificiation :
ssl_scache_shmcb.c :
typedef struct {
....
unsigned char index_num;
...
} SHMCBHeader;
...
...
static BOOL shmcb_init_memory(server_rec *s, void *shm_mem, unsigned int
shm_mem_size)
{
...
unsigned int temp, loop, granularity;
...
...
header->index_num = temp; // WOAH .. HOW DO WE HANDLE
OVERFLOWS
...
}
Thx
-Madhu
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
