"R. DuFresne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 01.12.01: > The problem you face is a tough one, as you are trying to push a poorly > designed OS with a well designed aplication to be stable and secure. The > windows platform has been repeatedly dogged with issues and will continue > to be so plauged for a long time yet. Widows is just not up to the task > at hand, you would be far better off grabbing something much more stable > and suited to the task at hand, say openbsd, or even linux, which give > much better bang for the buck, even on cheaper hardware then any of the > windows variants. Patches for issues are much faster incoming to deal > with issues that drop up uner the unix-like OS' then they ever are > forthcoming for the windows platform, which the mgt of M$ is very > resistant to admitting to issues, even when faced with extraordinary > evidence such exist. IUt has long been our stand here that windows was > meant for the desktop at best and never yet suited to serving the net. >
No question: I would also prefer to develop under LINUX SOO MUCH (!) but I have no choice: the project is bound to windows NT hosts and I was not able to convince the company to take LINUX (or UNIX) - I tried all the arguments as you stated above. So what I need are other people with the same problem, that they MUST develop under windows NT and have a RELIABLE apache running on such a machine. Are there any people out there - stating that they have a apache mod_ssl running on windows NT RELIABLE ??? johannes ______________________________________________________________________________ All inclusive! 100 MB Speicher, werbefrei, SMS günstiger, Wunschrufnummer, Events, Preisvorteile und mehr unter http://club.web.de/?mc=021104 ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
