Hey Cliff,
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On 5/30/06, *Frank van Beek* wrote:
I understand your confusion. In my post I masked out the first two
numbers of the IP-addresses.
But we do have 4 VirtualHosts on 4 different IP-addresses. As it turned
out (see a previous post), our problem was caused by a misconfigured
reverse DNS.
I'm glad you figured it out, but it's still a little bit unclear to me
why the DNS should have had any effect.
The NameVirtualHost directives in the config snippet you posted are
extraneous and should be removed. I wonder if you'd gotten rid of those
if the problem would have gone away regardless of DNS.
I checked a couple of pages on VirtualHosts in the Apache documentation.
As far as I can see in the examples in most of them there a
NameVirtualHost for every VirtualHost, even when it's running on a
different port.
See the examples here:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/vhosts/examples.html
I don't know enough about Apache configuration to know when you need
both, so could you please explain me why in our configuration the
NameVirtualHost directives are extraneous?
Met groet,
Frank.
--
Frank van Beek
WAXTRAPP BV
van Diemenstraat 366
1013CR Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Phone: +31 (0)20 672 2308
Fax: +31 (0)20 672 2488
http://www.waxtrapp.com
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
