On Saturday, November 10, 2001, at 02:54 PM, John Siracusa wrote: > That is very similar, and I didn't find it earlier (dunno how I missed >
> I think there's room for one more, slightly different "little object > base > class" (but still don't know what to call it) How about you? :) > 1 - I am facing a similar dilemma in the realm of templating. I have been working on something which is 90-95% similar in usage to HTML::Template, yet I don't want to put my cute little baby down and eat humble pie. Call it programmer's ego. 2 - Class::MakeMethods sports an extensible architecture. Your desired style of object creation and initialization can be plugged into his architecture and contributed: http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/CPAN/data/Class-MakeMethods/MakeMethods.html
