* Bruno Negrao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-13 16:32]: > Even if I use the technique you suggested, when an automated > cpan-tester went to install my module, it will fail if it > didn't have daemontools installed, right?
I'm not sure how CPAN testers would react to that result, but even if they report a failure (which would be stupid really), it would at least be a failure with *no* tests executed. And I would *hope* that "refuses to install" is a different beast for CPAN testers than "fails tests" anyway. > I would like to print a warning message to the STDERR in order > to advise about it, I suggested that exact thing. ;) > but I don't know how a cpan-tester would react if it find some > output to STDERR... Depends on how automated CPAN tester tests are.. if the process is even a bit manual, then what I suggested would be your best bet. -- Regards, Aristotle "If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life seriously enough."
