On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 08:13:08AM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
>
> Yeah, HTML::Tooltip and CGI::Tooltip seem like the obvious names. I
> don't think you need to put "Javascript" into the name, that's too much
> information.
Actually, I like JavaScript::Tooltip. If the the code is not
HTML-specific, it may well be useful in other places JavaScript is used.
It's my understanding that JavaScript also is used with SVG, PDF and
Scribus documents.
So I think a good name might be JavaScript::Tooltip::HTML.
Then people could implement the same API with different backends:
JavaScript::Tooltip::SVG
JavaScript::Tooltip::PDF
(I'm not even sure that PDF would support this kind of tooltip, but
I imagine SVG would.)
Mark
