On 1 Jul 2004, at 03:21, Ken Williams wrote:
On Jun 30, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Steffen Goeldner wrote:
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-23 17:53]:
For me, personally, something like Sub::DeferedPartial would
express the intent more clearly.
That's the best proposition I've heard so far.
Looks like a vast majority voted for Sub::DeferedPartial - thus
I'll adopt it. Thanks.
If you like "DeferedPartial", you'll *LOVE* "DeferredPartial"! =)
Darn...
In my defence it was at the end of a long day :-)
Adrian
