"Randy W. Sims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > Hmm, we have: > > 1) Simon's code review ladder: > <http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/code-review-ladder> Seems rather dead to me. A very interresting link anyhow. Let's see if we can get more life there
> 2) Ask's CPAN Ratings: <http://cpanratings.perl.org/> We had a long discussion about this. As long the rating are not more visible and people are not "actively" ask to rate, there will be no real effect which is a pity because it's also a very good idea. > 3) Perl Monks' Reviews: <http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node=Reviews> That did work so well. Maybe I should have done it in another way but I've done my best. I can't seriously review my own modules (remember it's the only vonlontary review module so far) or it will be no better than module authors that rate their own modules. > Each has a slightly different focus, but there is some overlap. A part > of me wonders if they should be at least loosely linked together instead > of remaining 3 independant but related review tools for authors & users; > maybe one review site with two faces, one to help module users find > modules and the other to help module authors improve their modules. Amen.
