Christopher Hicks writes: > I would think the existing examples might provide some light on this > but the modules to interface to emacs seem to be in their own Emacs:: > space and the vi-related modules seem to be in Vi::. I'm not sure > what the received wisdom is for the "right way" to do this would be, > but the option based on precedents could only be Wily::.
But 'Vi' and 'Emacs' are arguable more a Way of Life than a mere editor -- also they are so widely known by many people (especially those with a Unix background) that there isn't much chance of confusion or ambiguity with their names. That possibly doesn't apply to 'Wily'. Or, more to the point, it certainly doesn't apply to every possible application that anybody could ever want to create a Perl interface to. There are some 'Excel'-related modules in the Spreadsheet:: namespace. I think creating an Editor:: namespace for 'Wily' would be reasonable. Smylers
