Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Xavier, maybe I didn't explain it correctly. > > THe idea: > > RULES foo > aa==>bb > cd==>ef > ENDRULES >
I don't get it. Are you just creating syntactics sugar for:
my %rules =
( aa => 'bb',
cd => 'ef'
);
--
Carter's Compass: I know I'm on the right track when,
by deleting something, I'm adding functionality.
