On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 00:26 -0500, Randy W. Sims wrote: > Multimedia::GStreamer
What about just using Media::GStreamer and aliasing it to Gst? That would introduce a new top-level namespace, but I think it makes sense to have it. > I don't see any advantage of using Gst over GStreamer as a name, they > both describe the same thing and GStreamer is a tad more helpfull (to > google a description). It's all about the length. I need something that is easy and fast to type. > Then Gnome part as mentioned seems irrelevant. Glib is possibly usefull > info, but probably better conveyed via documentation as an > implementation issue. Agreed. > It might be nice to "say" somethnig about what it does: plugin, > pipeline... I can't think of a better word. Well, that's just an implementation detail too, isn't it? -- Bye, -Torsten
