Hi Andrew,
* Andrew & Terri Hanenkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-26 11:05]:
>2. If not (1), what's a good name? Content::Repository?
>Something else?
Something else, most definitely, simply on the grounds that
Content:: is a less than self-describing TLNS. I wish I had a
good suggestion, though. The concept is so generic that I think
it will be hard to name well. I am thinking that Repository::
should be the TLNS, but I dunno.
>Another reason for me taking this seriously is because there are
>some in the industry trying to hype this one on the level of
>importance of the emergence of RDBMS in the 1970's.
You mean they're re-discovering hierarchical databases that were
displaced by RDBMS? :-)
Regards,
--
#Aristotle
*AUTOLOAD=*_;sub _{s/(.*)::(.*)/print$2,(",$\/"," ")[defined wantarray]/e;$1};
&Just->another->Perl->hacker;
