> Thoughts:
>
> 1.  I can understand your not wanting to mention the name of the
> module, but we might be able to provide more help if we know it,
> particularly if someone on this list is aware of what happened.
> 2.  You could fork the module on the CPAN (which means maintaining it,
> something you might not want to do).
> 3.  You could fork the module for your company's internal use, which I
> know many programmers do.
> 4.  You could tell us what functionality you added.  I do know that
> some authors just won't respond to what they consider unimportant or
> bad requests (I'm not saying your changes are unimportant or bad; the
> author might just see them that way.)
>
> I might add that if a fork happens, many people might be happy to see
> the fork on the CPAN.  The theory is that many people can benefit. 
> However, that means you have to maintain it and that can be more
> trouble than it's worth.  More than once I've begged people for
> patches, only to be ignored.  Plenty of other authors have had the same
> experience.  Maintaining modules can be frustrating.
>
>   
sorry the module is DNS::ZoneParse. I could fork it, no problem. I am
using it all the time in my company, so it is better for public that
changes appear on CPAN, not only my private svn.






Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to