Le vendredi 12 janvier 2007 à 14:11, David Landgren écrivait: > >I was also wondering whether - given that backpan exists so people can > >always find them if they really want them - there shouldn't be a > >mechanism for removing modules that are unloved and unused. > > That strikes me as a little severe. Some may be packaged with OS > distributions. > > Heap::Priority sounds useful, as does Algorithm::LCSS. What needs to be > done, and was discussed recently, is have a way of detecting dead > modules, based on untaken RT tickets and author uploads.
Maybe a yearly email from PAUSE asking them to click a "I'm still active" form would be enough? -- Philippe "BooK" Bruhat When you run from your problem, you make it that much harder for good fortune to catch you, as well. (Moral from Groo The Wanderer #14 (Epic))
