>>>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:21:04 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel T. Staal" <[EMAIL >>>>> PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, September 12, 2007 3:08 pm, A. Pagaltzis said: >> >> You mean a circular dependency? If that can be resolved by writing a >> bundle, then arguably thatâ.s something the installer should be smart >> enough to figure out, isnâ.t it? > How about a module that might use another module -- if it is installed > when the module is configured at install. It's not really circular: The > module will work without the other module, just not the same way. Something like that. Or even simpler: B depends on A but the author of B does not specify the dependency. -- andreas
