On 9 Oct 2007, at 08:38, Ovid wrote:
Seems to have no impact on require at all.  I suspect that's because
it's not a subroutine.

require is special in some way isn't it? Doesn't have a prototype but can be replaced I think.

Which reminds me that I have a slew of require abusing modules to release once Test::Harness 3 is done. I should probably mention them here at some point so everyone can point out that they already exist :)

--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten



Reply via email to