We all love the CPAN testers and the results publised at http://testers.cpan.org.
But recently I suddenly saw a big load of failures in one of my packages. All these failures were for 5.11.0. Now, 5.11.0 is a development version, and a moving target. A test failure with blead reveals often more about blead than about the tested package. So, on one hand, it is a good thing that packages are being tested with blead versions. On the other hand, when users want to find out if a package is usable they're only interested in released versions of perl. What are your ideas about this? Should blead test results be separated from the other results? -- Johan
