On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:33:09AM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was told it was a planned feature when KWILLIAMS turned up on london.pm
> > and yelled "FUD" because I was complaining about users' problems in the
> > real world rather than the problems of an ideal user that somehow magically
> > knows that Module::Build is special and they have to remember to update it
> > or installations will inexplicably fail.
>
> Can you show us that thread or a specific bug?
The london.pm archive is searchable; I was complaining about now-fixed
bugs that were still in the wild anyway - a response of "these are now
fixed but it -is- a shame there's no easy way to force an update" would
have been fine, I only took exception to having "FUD" yelled at me when
I still encounter these problems regularly when supporting clients and OOS
users.
> Autobundling of M::B is indeed a planned feature. It's my personal
> top priority. But we wanted to get "all the rest" of the work that's
> been done in the last 1.5 years out the door before tackling it. And
> autobundling is a nice special kind of feature that specifically
> doesn't have to be tied to a major release schedule, so as long as we
> get it out the door in a small amount of calendar time, people should
> be happy.
That's absolutely and perfectly logical, and I look forward to seeing it
on CPAN.
KWILLIAMS++
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Want a managed development or deployment platform?
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/
