On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Paul LeoNerd Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:11:33AM -0800, Bill Ward wrote: >> > String::Overlay >> > String::Overlaid >> > String::Overlays >> I think Overlain may be more grammatical than Overlaid > > Overlaid, Overlain... One of those annoying centuries-old legacies of > languages. Seems Perl isn't the only language to suffer those ;) > >> but I think I prefer MarkUp personally. > > Hrm. Well, MarkUp would tend to suggest issues of formatting or > rendering attributes. That was mostly the use-case I had in mind, but > only indirectly. Nothing in the implementation directly requires that to > be the case.
True. What we really have here is "attributes of substrings" but that's kinda long.
