# from David Cantrell
# on Wednesday 08 April 2009 12:06:
> As I've said before, this is silly. It's a tool, so either it works
> or
>
>> it doesn't. We can't really have "controversy" about whether it
>> works or how it works.
>
>Despite your saying that we can't, we do. There is disagreement about
>whether it's a good idea to use Module::Build, and merely denying that
>the disagreement exists is ... well, it's silly.
You're saying there is a debate about whether stagnation is a good idea?
Dissenters are certainly free to hold their opinions without reason, but
I would rather they not inflict those irrationalities on others as
advice.
Please elaborate on why one should *not* use Module::Build.
Thanks,
Eric
--
Peer's Law: The solution to the problem changes the problem.
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
