On 28/08/2011 20:03, sawyer x wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Lyle <webmas...@cosmicperl.com
<mailto:webmas...@cosmicperl.com>> wrote:
On 28/08/2011 19:30, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* Arthur Corliss<corl...@digitalmages.com
<mailto:corl...@digitalmages.com>> [2011-08-28 19:55]:
With friends like Google protecting your information, who
needs
encryption? ;-)
--Arthur Corliss
Live Free or Die
Right, so just let everyone in any coffee shop or any other
open network
you connect to sniff all your traffic.
Did you have an actual point?
I always find it amusing when comments against google seem to get
at people. After all, Google is just another Microsoft :P
You clearly misunderstood Aristotle. He doesn't care about a comment
against Google, and I'm sure he has no special affinity towards it. He
simply had a good remark on a discussion of the effectiveness and CPU
costs of SSL encryption and it was ignored with a completely
irrelevant comment.
I wasn't going to reply to this, but as this thread has continued... I
thought Arthur's point was so relevant and clear to the greater context
of this (as he has continued to outline), that such as comment as
Aristotle's could only be inspired by some kind of affinity felt towards
Google. Maybe it's just because I work with a guy that gets his back up
when you knock Google, that I read this as similar behaviour....
Lyle
