On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Daniel Lukasiak <est...@estrai.com> wrote:
> On 02/05/12 00:49, Todd Rinaldo wrote: > >> On May 1, 2012, at 1:09 PM, Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 wrote: >> >> If removal isn't possible is there any other mechanism (forced >>>> depreciation?) that can be used? >>>> >>> You could take it over and fix it… >> >> >> > I'd be more than happy to contribute but only if that would provide any > value. > In this case I think there's more value in removing this broken module, > there are much better alternatives. > I understand this is a problem with CPAN's nature, but there must be a > line somewhere. > Taking it over only to deprecate it might be a solution. -- Check out my LEGO blog at http://www.brickpile.com Follow/friend me: facebook.com/billward • flickr.com/photos/billward • twitter.com/williamward
