Hello, all... I posted about this once before under an entirely different namespace prior to realizing that the group of other filters it would have joined at that location (Image::Filter) were all C, wrapped for perl, and that I wasn't equipped to do the same and offer the same API to match the rest. After presenting at a local perl meetup, it was suggested to me that, since my new image edge simplification algorithm depends entirely on GD::Image, it ought to reflect that in the namespace.
To that end, one shot in the dark could be ..::Filter::Simple or Filter::SimpleEdge or something to that end. I'm refactoring the algorithm currently to operate as a module rather than a script, and I'd like, if someone doth use GD::Image::Filter::WoopWoop; that they'd get the extended capabilities of GD::Image right along with it (rather than having to make the two play nice with each other themselves.) Thoughts? Demands? Objections? Thanks! -- @je_turcotte
