* Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯 <da...@cpan.org> [2013-08-04 18:05]: > There is already Regexp-Genex which portrays itself as a generator for > regexes, but its functionality is different from your module, so it's > a good idea to prevent confusion and avoid that overlap, "generator". > To "generate" is about as useful as the verbs "do" or "process", > anyway. How about Regexp-Methods? That seems to fit best given your > description.
Regexp::Methods is much more nondescript than Regex::Generator to me. From looking at that name, I would never ever come up with the right guess at the module’s actual purpose. I’d call this Regexp::Builder. -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
