On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Greg Lindahl <lind...@pbm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:38:00PM +0100, Smylers wrote: > > > How about Vehicle::Tesla::ModelS then? > > > > Does putting Device:: in front of that lot actually add anything, other > > than to the unwieldiness of the name? > > Vehicle:: doesn't generalize very well to toasters, refrigerators, > etc. If a new top-level name is a good idea, I'd suggest an > Internet-of-Things top-level, Thing:: or IoT:: or IOT:: > > This particular module, btw, will probably be good for future Tesla > vehicles; it's anyone's guess how the API will evolve. In fact, at > the moment it's just the reverse-engineered API used by the Tesla > iOS and Android apps; nothing officially supported. I'll have to > have a big fat dislciamer at the top of the POD... > Thing::Vehicle::Tesla::ModelS? -- Check out my LEGO blog at brickpile.com <http://www.brickpile.com/> Follow/friend me: Facebook <http://facebook.com/billward> • Flickr<http://flickr.com/photos/billward/>• Twitter <http://twitter.com/williamward> • LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/william-ward/63/393/985/>
