Neil Bowers on Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 09:36:42AM +0100: > How about Lingua::LO::Processing, or if that feels too generic, you > could go with Lingua::LO::TextProcessing, but I think the “Text” is > pretty redundant in that name. > > Another possibility is Lingua::LO::NLP, but I don’t the double > acronym, and people looking for neuro-linguistic programming modules > might get annoyed / confused :-)
Thanks for the suggestions! I think "Processing" sounds a bit too
generic, after all processing is what all modules (maybe with the
exception of something like Regexp::Common that just provides data) do
in a sense. "NLP" is short and sweet. Being in the Lingua:: namespace it
could be argued that it's obviously about natural language so that's no
better than Processing, but it does reduce typing.
People looking for neuro-linguistic processing stuff on CPAN are
probably confused already so I'll take that chance ;)
cheers,
Matthias
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
