Hello Pavel and Neil, >From a quick CPAN search it looks like there's already Telegram::Bot and WWW::Telegram::(Something). So I second using one of these namespaces instead of a new one.
Regards, On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Neil Bowers <neil.bow...@cogendo.com> wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > I made some bots for Telegram and decided to arrange common codebase into > module. > I called my project 'perlgram'. > Here it's https://github.com/pavelsr/perlgram > And this is example of bot based on module https://github.com/ > FabLab61/dt_bot > > What do you think, which package name would be better for publishing it at > CPAN ? > Is it ok to publish module under Perlgram name, like FindBin ? Or should I > add top-level hierarchy like WWW:: or Bot:: or API:: ? > > > In addition to Ron’s suggestion, the module-authors mailing list (copied > on this email) is a better place to ask for advice like this. > > And while I’m here, better then a Perlgram toplevel namespace, you could > go with a toplevel of Telegram::BotKit, or something like that, with your > distribution then being called Telegram-BotKit (note that the distribution > name needs to match the top-level module name). Then all modules in your > distribution would be inside the Telegram::BotKit::* namespace. > > Cheers, > Neil > > -- Konstantin S. Uvarin jabber: see <from> skype: kuvarin http://github.com/dallaylaen
