Hi Shlomi

It's been several years since I was last active in the Perl community, so
take this with a good pinch of salt (I think 5.8 was new at the time) :)

That being said, I remember each module having a dependencies file with the
minimum compatible perl version for that version of the module, which can
keep older versions of perl on older versions of your module.

I think we also need to consider the perl versions list
http://www.cpan.org/src/ where 5.28 & 5.26002 are considered "in
maintenance" & anything prior is considered "end of life". Do we have any
visibility of which versions are most commonly in use at present?

So I'd expect a perl module to work in current perl & a reasonable number
of previous versions. Perhaps if the latest release fixes some major
issues, it would be good to make it available a bit further back, but not
all the way.


Kind regards
Steve/SRPATT


On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 9:39 PM Shlomi Fish <shlo...@shlomifish.org> wrote:

> Hi all!
>
> This post is a little flamebait, so please try to keep the discussion
> civil.
>
> Anyway, after reading the discussion in this public github issue, and
> following
> some of the links (especially
>
> https://szabgab.com/what-does--if-it-aint-broke-dont-fix-it--really-mean.html
> ),
> do you think I was being unreasonable, or should I as a CPAN
> author/maintainer/adopter accommodate for people running old perl5s, in my
> case
> 5.10.x and below:
>
> https://github.com/shlomif/perl-XML-SemanticDiff/issues/3
>
> This reminds me of what chromatic wrote here -
> https://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2008/09/msg140206.html
> :
>
> «
> This is why we can't have nice things.
> »
>
> Any comments or opinions? I think I'll relax by watching a nice and fun
> video.
>
>         -- Shlomi
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Shlomi Fish       http://www.shlomifish.org/
> http://is.gd/htwEXQ - Integrating GNU Guile into GNU coreutils
>
> Joel’s Generalisation: If it happens to you, it happens to everybody.
> (Or: It’s never only you.)
>     — Based on http://www.joelonsoftware.com/news/20020402.html
>
> Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
>

Reply via email to