On Jul 5, 2006, at 7:38 AM, John Peacock wrote:

As you can see, there isn't much to the patch, since I wanted to make the minimal amount of changes required to get all current tests passing. I will provide additional tests of the new functionality before I suggest that it be
integrated into the core.

Please let me know what you think.

I like it. I think 2) and 3) are really the right way to do things, and clearly 1) will be necessary for that.

Personally I think I'd rather depend on version.pm itself rather than a M::B::Version work-alike, just because having two copies of the code is an unattractive option even if they're maintained together.

Let me know when you've got a patch that you think is ready.

 -Ken

Reply via email to