# from Ken Williams
# on Monday 11 September 2006 07:38 pm:
>Is it the right solution? Beats me. I still haven't gotten my hands
> on a system where I can replicate the problem.
Let's see, we worked-around the inflated argument list by removing @INC
directories that don't exist and then it fails a test on adding a
directory that doesn't exist to @INC.
plan skip_all => '...' if(-e '/etc/redhat-release');
(or maybe check `perl --version` for something indicative?)
Seriously, just skip anything that causes the least bit of trouble and
print a big warning about peRHl being of questionable compatibility.
At least then it will function in most cases and whoever finds the
weird bits can send patches or bug their vendor.
# from David Bogen on Monday 11 September 2006 10:46 am:
>Have I missed something? Is there a definitive method for getting
>Module::Build to, well, build on RedHat's Enterprise Linux?
AFAICT, the conclusion was "install perl".
--Eric
--
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
--Albert Einstein
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
