On Jan 5, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong, or should we add to @INC in
ACTION_testpodcoverage?
I get the same results if I take M::B out of the equation, and adding
blib/* to @INC solves it.
=================================
[~/.cpan/build/dotReader-v0.0.9] ken% perl Build.PL
[~/.cpan/build/dotReader-v0.0.9] ken% ./Build docs
[~/.cpan/build/dotReader-v0.0.9] ken% perl -MTest::Pod::Coverage -le
'Test::Builder->new->plan(tests=>1); pod_coverage_ok
("dtRdr::Search::Book", {}, "")'
1..1
not ok 1 -
# Failed test ''
# in -e at line 1.
# dtRdr::Search::Book: couldn't find pod
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 1.
[~/.cpan/build/dotReader-v0.0.9] ken% perl -Mblib -
MTest::Pod::Coverage -le 'Test::Builder->new->plan(tests=>1);
pod_coverage_ok("dtRdr::Search::Book", {}, "")'
1..1
ok 1 -
=================================
I think the problem may be that while Test::Pod::Coverage::all_modules
() looks for things in blib/, Test::Pod::Coverage::pod_coverage_ok()
doesn't.
-Ken
