# from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# on Wednesday 21 February 2007 12:03 pm:

>After searching through a few more document pages on CPAN, I decided
> to look through the source instead, and I found the relevant item in
> Module::Build::Base
>
>  my %licenses =
...
>    );
>  sub valid_licenses {
>    return \%licenses;
>  }
>
>I resumed searching through the available documentation in the
>Module::Build subclass documentation, and it wasn't until I clicked on
>Module::Build::API that I found it.
>
>Now, there are a couple of problems here.  One is that I wouldn't have
>expected to find the valid licenses in Module::Build::API

Agreed.  The M.B.Authoring pod should probably serve as an entry point, 
with links for things like "how do I add to META.yml?"

Maybe M.B.Authoring#licenses or M.B.Authoring.Properties#licenses?

>Secondly, there's the classic problem of code-to-document disconnect. 
> The key 'open_source' in %licenses has undef as a value, but in
> M::B::API, there's a link to 'http://www.opensource.org/licenses/'.
...
>2) If so, is there a way to automatically include the %licenses
> variable in POD documentation?
...
>3) If neither one above is any good, is there some way to
> auto-generate a LICENSES file to put in the distribution?

I'm all for DRY (SPOT), but I've never really liked the idea of runtime 
fetching values from pod just because pod is static.  I really wish pod 
were more dynamic, but alas.

How about just including perl and gpl items in the pod, then a "for 
other licenses see the output of" bit like so:

  perl -MModule::Build -e 'Module::Build->print_valid_licenses'

(aside: It could be a build action, but that would require one to have a 
Build script, which would then need to be recreated after choosing a 
license and putting it in Build.PL.)

Besides sidestepping the pod-parsing issue, the added benefit of keeping 
it in code is that plugins or site/user prefs can add to the output.

--Eric
-- 
Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power
to make you commit injustices.
--Voltaire
---------------------------------------------------
    http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to