On 07 Mar 2008 23:12:30 +0100, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "David Golden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > A missing dependency shouldn't be flagged as NA -- that's supposed to > > be only for Perl or architecture incompatibilities. > > A missing external binary may be categrorized an "architecture > incompatibility". > > > The "exit 0" trick is recommended for non-perl dependencies. > > Is this documented somewhere?
Definition of NA: http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/Reports "exit 0" trick: http://cpantest.grango.org/wiki/CPANAuthorNotes More recent versions of CPAN::Reporter include a link to the CPANAuthorNotes page on FAIL/NA/UNKNOWN reports. David
