Does anybody else have an opinion about this? I don't have strong objections to Module::BuildX, but the search-and-replace will be a hassle. I'd like a little more consensus that it's worth it.
On Sat, March 8, 2008 11:10 pm, Adam Kennedy wrote: > It's probably a good time to examine that precedent and see if it only > exists by accident. > > Adam K > > Christopher J. Madsen wrote: >> Eric Wilhelm wrote: >>> # from Christopher J. Madsen >>>> I've decided to call it >>>> Module::Build::DistVersion, unless someone can suggest a better name. >>> >>> I don't have a better suggestion offhand, but I wonder if >>> Module::BuildX might be a better prefix. >> >> Well, there are no existing Module::BuildX classes. Under >> Module::Build, we already have: >> >> Module::Build::Convert >> Module::Build::Debian >> Module::Build::JSAN >> Module::Build::Kwalitee >> Module::Build::PM_Filter >> Module::Build::TestReporter >> >> So there seems to be some precedent. -- Chris Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------- http://www.cjmweb.net --------------------
