These days I looked into the "optional_features" part of the spec and
found spec bugs. What about the following amendments?
(1) make optional_features a map, not a sequence of many maps. It
makes no sense to me that features have a sequence.
In case one really wants them to have a sequence, then the data
structure must be revisited because the spec actually demands a
structure: { foo => { description => "...", ... }}
(2) s/sequence/mapping in the text. Note that the spec already says
{map} in that line
(3) mention configure_requires
Index: META-spec.pod
===================================================================
--- META-spec.pod (Revision 10910)
+++ META-spec.pod (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -258,16 +258,16 @@
Example:
optional_features:
- - foo:
+ foo:
description: Provides the ability to blah.
requires:
Data::Dumper: 0
File::Find: 1.03
-I<(Spec 1.1) [optional] {map} A YAML sequence of names for optional features
+I<(Spec 1.1) [optional] {map} A YAML mapping of names for optional features
which are made available when its requirements are met. For each
feature a description is provided along with any of L<"requires">,
-L<"build_requires">, and L<"conflicts">, which have the same meaning in
+L<"build_requires">, L<"configure_requires">, and L<"conflicts">, which have
the same meaning in
this subcontext as described elsewhere in this document.>
=head2 build_requires
--
andreas
