Re: Subclass? Plugin? Mixin? Monkey Patch?

[David E. Wheeler]

On Jul 9, 2008, at 01:13, Eric Wilhelm wrote:

Shouldn't this be:

 __PACKAGE__->add_property(use_tap_harness => 0);

(instead of)
 __PACKAGE__->add_property(use_tap_harness => {});

So the --use_tap_harness=1 command-line option will work?

Yes, good catch. Pasto.

(For some value of 'work' -- that's a major wreck right now for
Module::Build's tests -- some assumption about blib/lib is wrong?)

Um, what?

Best,

David