On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Ken Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:23 AM, David Golden <[email protected]> wrote: > > Did the bleadperl team send patches to the module-build when they > happened? > > I don't recall. If not, that would have made it much easier to manage > > rather than having to now figure out where everything diverged. If so, > then > > I suppose it's our bad for not applying the patches. > > That's entirely possible - I'm not renowned for being the world's most > responsive patch applier. > > Also, my wife & I are about to go into the hospital in a couple hours > to begin induction for our 3rd kid, so I'll likely be out of > communication for a few days again. > Best of luck to you all! My first kid turned 3 months yesterday, so I'm very sympathetic to the hit on discretionary time. ;-) Fortunately, there are enough committers and co-maintainers that I think we can try to do something sane in your absence to get 0.31XX into blead. > I'm open to moving M::B to git (though I've never used git before) or > figuring out some new scheme to make this dual-life stuff easier. I > think it would be GREAT if we moved it to ext/ in blead so that we > didn't have to worry about repositioning files etc. > I helped Andreas migrate CPAN.pm from Subversion to git, so would be happy to help if you decide you want to make the switch. -- David
