On Mon, April 20, 2009 2:59 pm, David Golden wrote:
> A "Version Number" may be expressed in one of two forms:
>
> (a) A tuple of at least three integers, prefixed with a leading "v".
> Tuples may be separated by either periods (".") or underscores ("_").
> Examples: "v1.2.3", "v3.14.0", "v1.2.3.4", "v1.2.3_4".
>
> (b) A non-negative decimal number. The number may contain one or more
> underscores as per the rules for numeric literals.
>
> Form (a) is recommended for all new version numbers. Form (b) is
> allowed for compatibility with legacy version numbering.
Bluntly: No.
Use a triple tuple if you like, but I want my versions to be a number
and only a number.
I'm baffled that you would think dictating otherwise makes sense.
