2009/4/24 Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]>: > I would like to see #3, and I suspect that it could be implemented in > 5.12.0, excepting certain caveats for last-century compatibility, but > maybe if it changes now, it could make some sense in 9 more years.
You mean 6.2.0 right? Because the one-column scheme ran out of space after 5.9. Adam K
